Re: [Patch v3 20/23] ARM: config: Add a multi_v5_defconfig
Alexander Shiyan
shc_work at mail.ru
Wed Feb 19 10:08:44 EST 2014
Среда, 19 февраля 2014, 15:54 +01:00 от Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>:
> On Wednesday 19 February 2014 18:19:08 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Среда, 19 февраля 2014, 15:12 +01:00 от Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>:
> > > To allow regression build testing of multi v5 systems, add a
> > > multi_v5_defconfig, similar to the multi_v7_defconfig. This is based
> > > on kirkwood_defconfig, but with a few other boards added which claim
> > > to be MULTI_v5.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/configs/multi_v5_defconfig | 183 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 183 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/multi_v5_defconfig
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v5_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v5_defconfig
> > ...
> > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_LL=y
> > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_MVEBU_UART_ALTERNATE=y
> > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_VIRT=0xfed12000
> >
> > Should we disable lowlevel debug for multi-* config?
>
> Yes, definitely.
>
> On a related note, I'd like to add a CONFIG_BROKEN_MULTIPLATFORM Kconfig
> symbol and make all options depend on that which will result in a kernel
>
config DEBUG_LL
depends on! ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM
is not enough for this?
---
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list