[PATCH v3 1/4] Phytec phyFLEX-i.MX6 : Added USB_OTG Support
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at linaro.org
Wed Feb 19 01:59:53 EST 2014
Do not send email in html.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:11:41PM +0530, Ashutosh wrote:
> By seeing the discussion would the below changes is appropriate
>
> regulators {
> compatible = "simple-bus";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> reg_usb_otg_vbus: regulator at 0 {
> compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> reg = <0>;
> regulator-name = "usb_otg_vbus";
> regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> gpio = <&gpio4 15 0>;
> };
>
> But as Mark [1] suggested not to use simple bus. Which one is more appropriate
> ?
Since it's already been used so widely and provided us a nice way to use
the generic node name, I believe Mark is giving up his position.
Shawn
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg101477.html
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list