[PATCH RFC v2 00/35] Second preview of imx-drm cleanup series

[Philipp Zabel]

Hi Russell,

Am Montag, den 10.02.2014, 17:56 +0000 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:37:26PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > I'd like all of them to go through, too. If you don't want to have the DT
> > changes integrated, I'd appreciate if you could have a  look at my
> > patches on top of your series and possibly append them to your
> > series or let me synchronize somehow:
> > 
> > http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20140106.145159.a1d82ba9.en.html
> 
> I replied to your 2nd patch there...
> 
> I'm not happy ending up with a hard dependency between v4l2 code and
> code needed for the display side to work, especially when we can end
> up with imx-drm being the primary console display.  I've outlined my
> thoughts about what I think needs to happen in the reply to patch 2.

Thanks for your comments there. I have just updated and resent this
series ([RFC PATCH v3 0/9] imx-drm dt bindings), still with a temporary
local copy of the v4l2_of functions, as long as the final resting place
of the v4l2_of/of_graph functions seems to be a matter of discussion.

regards
Philipp