[PATCH v4 2/4] DT: Vendor prefixes: Add ricoh, ssi and synology
andrew at lunn.ch
Tue Feb 18 04:29:25 EST 2014
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:07:04AM +1000, Ben Peddell wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 8:34 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:45:35AM +1000, klightspeed at killerwolves.net wrote:
> >> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> >> The following patches make use of vendor names ricoh, ssi and
> >> synology. Add them to the vendor prefix list.
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> >> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason at lakedaemon.net>
> >> ---
> >> v2:
> >> Use stock ticker for Ricoh as vendor name
> >> s/Richoh/Ricoh/
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 3 +++
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >> index 40ce2df..8427681 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ ralink Mediatek/Ralink Technology Corp.
> >> ramtron Ramtron International
> >> realtek Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
> >> renesas Renesas Electronics Corporation
> >> +ricoy Ricoh Co. Ltd.
> >> rockchip Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> >> samsung Samsung Semiconductor
> >> sbs Smart Battery System
> >> @@ -79,11 +80,13 @@ schindler Schindler
> >> sil Silicon Image
> >> silabs Silicon Laboratories
> >> simtek
> >> +sii Seiko Instruments, Inc.
> >> sirf SiRF Technology, Inc.
> >> snps Synopsys, Inc.
> >> st STMicroelectronics
> >> ste ST-Ericsson
> >> stericsson ST-Ericsson
> >> +synology Synology, Inc.
> > Oh, great! Looks like this one is added (see my comment on patch 1).
> > I'm wondering if 'qnap' should be added as well.
> Do we want to use "qnap" or their ticker "qnapsz"?
It might also make sense to re-arrange the order of these patches, so
that this one comes first and then the power off patch. However it is
not too important, because the patches are probably going to get split
up and go thought different maintainers.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel