[PATCH v4 2/4] DT: Vendor prefixes: Add ricoh, ssi and synology

[Andrew Lunn]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:07:04AM +1000, Ben Peddell wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 8:34 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:45:35AM +1000, klightspeed at killerwolves.net wrote:
> >> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> >>
> >> The following patches make use of vendor names ricoh, ssi and
> >> synology.  Add them to the vendor prefix list.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> >> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason at lakedaemon.net>
> >> ---
> >> v2:
> >> Use stock ticker for Ricoh as vendor name
> >> s/Richoh/Ricoh/
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 3 +++
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >> index 40ce2df..8427681 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ ralink	Mediatek/Ralink Technology Corp.
> >>  ramtron	Ramtron International
> >>  realtek Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
> >>  renesas	Renesas Electronics Corporation
> >> +ricoy	Ricoh Co. Ltd.
> >>  rockchip	Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> >>  samsung	Samsung Semiconductor
> >>  sbs	Smart Battery System
> >> @@ -79,11 +80,13 @@ schindler	Schindler
> >>  sil	Silicon Image
> >>  silabs	Silicon Laboratories
> >>  simtek
> >> +sii	Seiko Instruments, Inc.
> >>  sirf	SiRF Technology, Inc.
> >>  snps 	Synopsys, Inc.
> >>  st	STMicroelectronics
> >>  ste	ST-Ericsson
> >>  stericsson	ST-Ericsson
> >> +synology	Synology, Inc.
> > 
> > Oh, great!  Looks like this one is added (see my comment on patch 1).
> > I'm wondering if 'qnap' should be added as well.
> 
> Do we want to use "qnap" or their ticker "qnapsz"?
> 

Hi Ben

Ticker.

It might also make sense to re-arrange the order of these patches, so
that this one comes first and then the power off patch. However it is
not too important, because the patches are probably going to get split
up and go thought different maintainers.

   Andrew