[PATCH 2/2] arm64: is_compat_task is defined both in asm/compat.h and linux/compat.h
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Mon Feb 17 14:32:10 EST 2014
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:11:32AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> kernel/seccomp.c includes linux/compat.h and, indicrectly, asm/compat.h
> via asm/syscall.h. Due to the duplicated definition of is_compat_task,
> compiling this file will fail in the case of !CONFIG_COMPAT.
> This patch makes the definition in asm/compat.h valid only if necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> index fda2704..72f3b18 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> @@ -305,10 +305,12 @@ static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_COMPAT */
>
> +#ifndef is_compat_task /* it's there in linux/compat.h */
> static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
This is horrible! Can we instead include linux/compat.h where we need this
macro and then remove this definition?
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list