[PATCH RFC v3 3/3] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 01:39:56AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

[...]

> > +	- cache-state-retained
> > +		Usage: See definition
> > +		Value type: <none>
> > +		Definition: if present cache memory is retained on power down,
> > +			    otherwise it is lost.
> 
> Might be better to define which caches?

I do not expect caches in the same power domain to have different retention
capabilities, so a flag per-state should be enough. If anyone is unhappy
about this please flag it up. List of caches affected can be retrieved by
walking the power-domain specifiers and check those against the caches power
domains.

Thanks,
Lorenzo