[PATCH 02/12] dt-bindings: document s3c24xx controller for external clock output
Heiko Stübner
heiko at sntech.de
Sun Feb 16 15:33:52 EST 2014
Am Sonntag, 9. Februar 2014, 02:54:40 schrieb Tomasz Figa:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On 13.12.2013 13:59, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > The clock settings are distributed over a regular register and parts
> > of the misccr register.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
> > ---
> >
> > .../bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-dclk.txt | 53
> > ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-dclk.txt>
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-dclk.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-dclk.txt new
> > file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..0a1f7b1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-dclk.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> > +* Samsung S3C24XX External Clock Output Controller
> > +
> > +The S3C24XX series can generate clock signals on two clock output pads.
> > +The clock binding described here is applicable to all SoCs in
> > +the s3c24x family.
> > +
> > +Required Properties:
> > +
> > +- compatible: should be one of the following.
> > + - "samsung,s3c2410-dclk" - controller in S3C2410 SoCs.
> > + - "samsung,s3c2412-dclk" - controller in S3C2412 SoCs.
> > + - "samsung,s3c2440-dclk" - controller in S3C2440 and S3C2442 SoCs.
> > + - "samsung,s3c2443-dclk" - controller in S3C2443 and later SoCs.
> > +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
> > mapped
> > + region.
> > +- #clock-cells: should be 1.
> > +- samsung,misccr: phandle to the syscon managing the misccr register,
> > which + holds configuration settings for different soc-components
> > (clocks, usb, ...).
> Hmm, looking at the datasheet, DCLK and CLKOUT registers seem to be part
> of the pin controller. I wonder if there is really a need for different
> driver and device node to handle them.
>
> Could this be simply made a part of the s3c24xx pinctrl driver,
> extending it to register also a clock provider under the same DT node?
it could, but of course the non-dt platforms would not be able to use it in
this case.
So I guess, we could get rid of this dt binding, implement the clkout handling
in the pinctrl driver for dt platforms, but use the platform-driver this
binding described for the time we're still handling non-dt s3c24xx machines.
Heiko
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list