[PATCH v2 4/4] Documentation: dt: OMAP: Update Overo/Tobi

Tony Lindgren tony at atomide.com
Fri Feb 14 11:39:42 EST 2014


* Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com> [140214 00:17]:
> On 02/14/2014 01:58 AM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 02/13/2014 03:43 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >> On 02/13/2014 04:25 AM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> >>> Update the compatible string for Overo/Tobi to reflect the latest
> >>> changes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard at epfl.ch>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt | 2 +-
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt
> >>> index 34dc40c..af9b4a0 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt
> >>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Boards:
> >>>    compatible = "ti,omap3-beagle", "ti,omap3"
> >>>  
> >>>  - OMAP3 Tobi with Overo : Commercial expansion board with daughter board
> >>> -  compatible = "ti,omap3-tobi", "ti,omap3-overo", "ti,omap3"
> >>> +  compatible = "gumstix,omap3-overo-tobi", "gumstix,omap3-overo", "ti,omap3"
> >> omap3-overo-storm-tobi.dts is not covered here, so, I wonder as the
> >> number of boards supported keep increasing, is'nt it better we drop
> >> the board information from omap.txt?
> >>
> > 
> > I am not opposed to this. We will just have checkpatch warnings due to
> > undocumented compatible strings.
> 
> Aaah, I seemed to have missed bff5da43 commit, thanks for pointing me
> at it - unrelated to this patch, I think the board cleanups is a
> little overdue :(
> 
> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com>

OK thanks picking up this too.

Tony



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list