[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: sunxi: dt: Convert to the new i2c compatibles
Wolfram Sang
wsa at the-dreams.de
Thu Feb 13 03:26:30 EST 2014
Why is the devicetree list not on CC? (Added now)
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:51:25AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Switch the device tree to the new compatibles introduced in the i2c drivers
> to have a common pattern accross all Allwinner SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi | 6 +++---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi | 6 +++---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi | 6 +++---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi | 10 +++++-----
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi
> index 28273f9..ac65c8a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun4i-a10.dtsi
> @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@
> };
>
> i2c0: i2c at 01c2ac00 {
> - compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-i2c";
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-i2c";
Can't we have:
compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-i2c", "allwinner,sun4i-i2c";
? And keep the old "allwinner,sun4i-i2c" and extend it with a SoC
specific a10 compatible entry when a distinction is needed?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi
> index 6de40b6..537072c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13.dtsi
> @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@
> };
>
> i2c0: i2c at 01c2ac00 {
> - compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-i2c";
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-i2c";
For non-a10, That should be at least
compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a13-i2c", "allwinner,sun4i-a10-i2c";
or
compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a13-i2c", "allwinner,sun4i-i2c";
depending on the outcome above.
Or is my knowledge outdated already?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140213/a0ffedbe/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list