[PATCH 4/7] spi: pl022: attempt to get sspclk by name

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:33:29AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

> For new bindings I'd really like to push people to always use named
> clocks as it makes things far more flexible, but I appreciate that here
> there are issues associated with modifying an existing binding.

> Mark, do you have specific issues that named clocks cause that I could
> look into?

None, I actively prefer naming them (though Russell's point about people
picking names poorly pre-DT does make it clear why it makes sense that
we weren't doing that).  I was just grumbling about the fact that
transitioning from unnamed to named is a bit ugly.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140212/fc22f8a3/attachment.sig>