[PATCH v4 1/8] at91: dt: Adds support for the bus matrix declaration in the DT
Gregory CLEMENT
gregory.clement at free-electrons.com
Wed Feb 12 05:45:15 EST 2014
Hi Jean-Jacques,
Thanks for this new series, I have one little comment:
On 12/02/2014 11:06, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot at traphandler.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> index f7ca97b..b8d0b66 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> @@ -487,6 +487,28 @@ end:
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
> +static struct of_device_id matrix_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9261-bus-matrix", },
> + { /*sentinel*/ }
> +};
> +
> +static void at91_dt_matrix(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> +
> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matrix_ids);
> + if (!np) {
> + pr_debug("AT91: unable to find compatible bus matrix controller node in dtb\n");
I think that a panic here should be more consistent with the next check.
Indeed if it fails here then at91_matrix_base will be uninitialized too,
and it will make the kernel crash when at91_matrix_base will be accessed.
Thanks,
Gregory
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + at91_matrix_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + if (!at91_matrix_base)
> + panic("Impossible to ioremap at91_matrix_base\n");
> +
> + of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void)
> {
> at91_dt_ramc();
> @@ -506,6 +528,7 @@ void __init at91_dt_initialize(void)
> at91_dt_rstc();
> at91_dt_ramc();
> at91_dt_shdwc();
> + at91_dt_matrix();
>
> /* Init clock subsystem */
> at91_dt_clock_init();
>
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list