[PATCH] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
arnd at arndb.de
Tue Feb 11 09:12:45 EST 2014
On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> The only remaining question is if we should create generic DT binding
> >> for fifo depth. Arnd, Rob: Any opinion about it?
> >> Definitely will be worth to have one generic binding if this is generic feature.
> >> But if this is just specific feature for us then current properties should
> >> be fine.
> >> In general all these xlnx,XXX properties just reflect all configurable options
> >> which you can setup in design tool which means that provide full hw description
> >> with all variants and they are automatically generated from tools.
> >> Please let me know what you think.
> > I like:
> > rx-fifo-depth
> > tx-fifo-depth
> No problem with that. Let Kedar to fix it according this and he will send v2 with this.
Sounds reasonable to me too.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel