[PATCHv2 2/2] arm: Get rid of meminfo

[Courtney Cavin]

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 04:25:34AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 2/6/2014 6:09 PM, Courtney Cavin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:02:31AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> memblock is now fully integrated into the kernel and is the prefered
> >> method for tracking memory. Rather than reinvent the wheel with
> >> meminfo, migrate to using memblock directly instead of meminfo as
> >> an intermediate.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa at codeaurora.org>
> > [...]
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c
> >> index 0b11c1a..51d814e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c
> >> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> >>   #include <linux/io.h>
> >>   #include <linux/module.h>
> >>   #include <linux/reboot.h>
> >> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> >>
> >>   #include <asm/setup.h>
> >>   #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> >> @@ -971,13 +972,9 @@ static void __init spitz_init(void)
> >>          spitz_i2c_init();
> >>   }
> >>
> >> -static void __init spitz_fixup(struct tag *tags, char **cmdline,
> >> -                              struct meminfo *mi)
> >> +static void __init spitz_fixup(struct tag *tags, char **cmdline)
> >>   {
> >> -       sharpsl_save_param();
> >> -       mi->nr_banks = 1;
> >> -       mi->bank[0].start = 0xa0000000;
> >> -       mi->bank[0].size = (64*1024*1024);
> >> +       memblock_addr(0xa0000000, SZ_64M);
> >
> > memblock_add() ?
> Yes, that was a typo on my part. I'll send out a v3 with collected acks.
> 

So, I also just noticed that you specifically remove the call to
sharpsl_save_param() here.  I'm presuming that this is also an error, as
you haven't removed it from any of the other pxa fixups, and it seems
unrelated to the change.

-Courtney