[RFC/PATCH v2] ARM: vDSO gettimeofday using generic timer architecture
Steve Capper
steve.capper at linaro.org
Mon Feb 10 11:51:16 EST 2014
Hi Russell,
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:20:23AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:05:49PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > + /* Grab the vDSO code pages. */
> > + for (i = 0; i < vdso_pages; i++) {
> > + pg = virt_to_page(&vdso_start + i*PAGE_SIZE);
> > + ClearPageReserved(pg);
> > + get_page(pg);
> > + vdso_pagelist[i] = pg;
> > + }
>
> Why do we want to clear the reserved status? This looks over complicated
> to me.
>
This looks like it was inherited from the PowerPC code where the
behaviour of set_pte_at would change dependent on whether or not the
page was reserved (set_pte_at->set_pte_filter->maybe_pte_to_page). I
think we can safely remove this from ARM and ARM64.
> > +
> > + /* Sanity check the shared object header. */
> > + vbase = vmap(vdso_pagelist, 1, 0, PAGE_KERNEL);
> > + if (vbase == NULL) {
> > + pr_err("Failed to map vDSO pagelist!\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + } else if (memcmp(vbase, "\177ELF", 4)) {
> > + pr_err("vDSO is not a valid ELF object!\n");
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto unmap;
> > + }
>
> Why do we need to vmap() pages which are already accessible - vdso_start
> must be part of the kernel image, and therefore will be accessible via
> standard mappings.
>
This is a dress rehersal for install_special_mapping more than anything.
If we map the page, and look at the first 4 bytes, are they what we
expect?
> > +
> > + /* Grab the vDSO data page. */
> > + pg = virt_to_page(vdso_data);
> > + get_page(pg);
> > + vdso_pagelist[i] = pg;
>
> Same goes for this.
>
We need the data page so we can remap it into user space via
install_special_mapping.
Cheers,
--
Steve
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list