[RFC PATCH] ARM: Add imprecise abort enable/disable macro
Fabrice Gasnier
fabrice.gasnier at st.com
Mon Feb 10 09:44:50 EST 2014
On 02/10/2014 03:16 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:19:15PM +0100, Fabrice GASNIER wrote:
>> This patch adds imprecise abort enable/disable macros.
>> It also enables imprecise aborts when starting kernel.
> Relying on imprecise aborts for hardware probing would be considered bad
> hardware and/or software design for ARM-specific stuff.
>
> PCI is more generic though, so we may have to put up with this to some
> extent. Can you point me to the affected probing code? I'm not very
> familiar with that stuff...
Hi,
I'm currently re-basing to prepare upstream of such a driver so, no code
for now on my side,
but, I saw others that have similar behavior :
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg26124.html
Basically, I think all PCI drivers using hook_fault_code(16+6, ...) use
similar mechanism.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier at st.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 1 +
>> arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++++
>> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h
>> index 3b763d6..82e3834 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/irqflags.h
>> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
>>
>> #define local_fiq_enable() __asm__("cpsie f @ __stf" : : : "memory", "cc")
>> #define local_fiq_disable() __asm__("cpsid f @ __clf" : : : "memory", "cc")
>> +
>> +#define local_abt_enable() __asm__("cpsie a @ __sta" : : : "memory", "cc")
>> +#define local_abt_disable() __asm__("cpsid a @ __cla" : : : "memory", "cc")
>> #else
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -130,6 +133,36 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
>> : "memory", "cc"); \
>> })
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Enable Aborts
>> + */
>> +#define local_abt_enable() \
>> + ({ \
>> + unsigned long temp; \
>> + __asm__ __volatile__( \
>> + "mrs %0, cpsr @ sta\n" \
>> +" bic %0, %0, %1\n" \
>> +" msr cpsr_c, %0" \
> I suggest you use "cpsie/cpsid a" instead. This requires ARMv6, but the
> CPSR.A bit only exists on ARMv6 and later anyway. Poking that bit
> on earlier CPUs may cause unpredictable behaviour, so these macros
> should be no-ops for v5 and earlier.
Thanks,
I'll prepare a new patch that way.
>
>> + : "=r" (temp) \
>> + : "r" (PSR_A_BIT) \
>> + : "memory", "cc"); \
>> + })
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Disable Aborts
>> + */
>> +#define local_abt_disable() \
>> + ({ \
>> + unsigned long temp; \
>> + __asm__ __volatile__( \
>> + "mrs %0, cpsr @ cla\n" \
>> +" orr %0, %0, %1\n" \
>> +" msr cpsr_c, %0" \
>> + : "=r" (temp) \
>> + : "r" (PSR_A_BIT) \
>> + : "memory", "cc"); \
>> + })
>> +
>> #endif
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
>> index dc894ab..c2093cb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void)
>>
>> local_irq_enable();
>> local_fiq_enable();
>> + local_abt_enable();
>>
>> /*
>> * OK, it's off to the idle thread for us
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
>> index 4636d56..ef15709 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
>> @@ -900,6 +900,10 @@ void __init early_trap_init(void *vectors_base)
>>
>> flush_icache_range(vectors, vectors + PAGE_SIZE * 2);
>> modify_domain(DOMAIN_USER, DOMAIN_CLIENT);
>> +
>> + /* Enable imprecise aborts */
>> + local_abt_enable();
> It would be good to clean up why aborts are not being consistently
> enabled on boot.
I did a bit of analysis and summarized it in this thread. I've not been
further:
http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20140203.164322.edba427a.en.html
BR,
Fabrice
>
> Really, they should be enabled, except for a brief window during
> boot when the vectors are not mapped and the abort can't be dispatched.
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list