[PATCH 14/28] Remove MACH_SMDKC210
Paul Bolle
pebolle at tiscali.nl
Mon Feb 10 08:31:12 EST 2014
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 11:41 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 07:47:52PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Please fix whatever script you're using to generate your mails, it's
> generating corrupt headers.
I think Richard's mail didn't end up on lkml. But it's pretty clear what
it must have looked like.
> > config SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM9713
> > tristate "SoC AC97 Audio support for SMDK with WM9713"
> > - depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110 || MACH_SMDKV310 || MACH_SMDKC210)
> > + depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110 || MACH_SMDKV310)
>
> Like I said to Paul this isn't fixing the actual issue - think about why
> the symbol was there in the first place and why it was removed. There
> is a problem here but this would make it less likely that it would be
> properly fixed.
Would you mind going through this one step at a time, just to make sure
_I_ understand what it is that you'd like to see?
If so, to be absolutely sure we start from the same point: do you agree
that the above line now effectively reads
depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110 || false || false)
because there's neither a Kconfig symbol MACH_SMDKV310 nor a Kconfig
symbol MACH_SMDKC210?
Paul Bolle
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list