[PATCH v3 05/11] ARM: LPAE: provide an IPA capable pmd_addr_end

[Christoffer Dall]

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 03:44:01PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:04:56AM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:43:28AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:55:45PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > The default pmd_addr_end macro uses an unsigned long to represent
> > > > the VA. When used with KVM and stage-2 translation, the VA is
> > > > actually an IPA, which is up to 40 bits. This also affect the
> > > > SMMU driver, which also deals with stage-2 translation.
> > > > 
> > > > Instead, provide an implementation that can cope with larger VAs
> > > > by using a u64 instead. This version will overload the default
> > > > one provided in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h | 5 +++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
> > > > index 03243f7..594867b 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
> > > > @@ -262,6 +262,11 @@ static inline int has_transparent_hugepage(void)
> > > >  	return 1;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > +#define pmd_addr_end(addr, end)						\
> > > > +({	u64 __boundary = ((addr) + PMD_SIZE) & PMD_MASK;		\
> > > > +	(__boundary - 1 < (end) - 1)? __boundary: (end);		\
> > > > +})
> > > 
> > > I see why you need this but it affects all the other uses of
> > > pmd_addr_end() with 32-bit VA. It would be slight performance, I don't
> > > think it's noticeable.
> > > 
> > > A different approach could be something like (untested):
> > > 
> > > #define pmd_addr_end(addr, end)					\
> > > ({	__typeof__(addr) __boundary = ...
> > > 	...
> > > })
> > > 
> > > What about the pgd_addr_end(), do we need this or it's not used by KVM?
> > > 
> > 
> > What about pud_addr_end(), is that defined as a noop on LPAE, or?
> > 
> > I would be in favor of introducing them all using your approach to avoid
> > somebody being inspired by the KVM code when dealing with IPAs and
> > breaking things unknowingly.
> 
> I had a brief chat with Marc yesterday around this and it may be safer
> to simply introduce kvm_p*d_addr_end() macros. You already do this for
> pgd_addr_end() since it cannot be overridden in the generic headers.
> 
Sounds good to me.  We should introduce all of them then.

Thanks,
-Christoffer