[PATCH 02/03] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: Break out USB0 OVC/VBUS

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Magnus,

On Friday 31 January 2014 12:10:05 Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 January 2014 08:10:19 Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> From: Magnus Damm <damm at opensource.se>
> >> 
> >> Create a new group for the USB0 OVC/VBUS pin by itself. This
> >> allows us to monitor PWEN as GPIO on the Lager board.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm at opensource.se>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7790.c |    9 +++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> --- 0001/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7790.c
> >> +++ work/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7790.c 2014-01-24
> > 10:23:32.000000000
> >> +0900 @@ -3231,6 +3231,13 @@ static const unsigned int usb0_pins[] =
> >>  static const unsigned int usb0_mux[] = {
> >>       USB0_PWEN_MARK, USB0_OVC_VBUS_MARK,
> >>  };
> >> +static const unsigned int usb0_ovc_vbus_pins[] = {
> >> +     /* OVC/VBUS */
> >> +     RCAR_GP_PIN(5, 19),
> >> +};
> >> +static const unsigned int usb0_ovc_vbus_mux[] = {
> >> +     USB0_OVC_VBUS_MARK,
> >> +};
> > 
> > Another option would have been to split the existing usb0 group in
> > usb0_pwen and usb0_ovc. I'm not sure which is better though, I'd just
> > like to know if you had given it a thought.
> 
> I actually did just that in my first local attempt, but I decided not
> to since it will only cause potential breakage.

OK. I assume that using PWEN without OVC/VBUS doesn't make sense, right ?

> > Regardless, what about naming the new group usb0_ovc instead of
> > usb0_ovc_bus to keep names short ?
> 
> Is there any particular reason why you want shorter names?

When it doesn't reduce clarity I prefer to keep names short, as that makes the 
code easier to read and write, and (slightly) lowers the memory footprint.

> From my side, I prefer to keep the names in sync with the data sheet. In
> this particular case it is a shared pin so OVC is used for Host while VBUS
> is used for gadget, so if you're proposing to ditch VBUS then this feels
> somewhat inconsistent with the current gadget use case. =)

I thought the pin was used for over current detection only, but that doesn't 
make sense for function mode, you're right. Let's keep the name as-is then.

Provided PWEN without OVC/VBUS doesn't make sense and won't be needed,

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart