[PATCH v2 7/7] cpufreq: exynos: remove all exynos specific cpufreq driver support
Lukasz Majewski
l.majewski at samsung.com
Wed Feb 5 08:49:53 EST 2014
Hi Nishanth,
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Okay, thanks. Initially it looked like adding boost frequencies into
> > operating-modes would convolute it but I guess I was wrong. So I
> > will add support for looking up "boost-frequencies" property in
> > dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table function and mark the frequencies
> > listed in this binding as CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ.
> I wonder if it is high time that we pop the cpufreq stuff out of opp.c
> other frameworks such as devfreq might choose to do things
> differently.
In my opinion, conceptually cpufreq's voltage and freq handling code
fits perfectly to OPP framework.
Yes. We can think about excluding cpufreq related code to e.g.
opp-cpufreq.c (and probably opp-devfreq.c if needed in the future).
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list