[PATCH v4 2/5] arm: add new asm macro update_sctlr
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Mon Feb 3 11:00:51 EST 2014
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:55:42PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 10:34:15AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 01:12:47PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > > Oh, that's neat - thanks!
> > >
> > > Well, given that, I can think of two less horrible options:
> > > 1)
> > > .macro update_sctlr, tmp:req, set=, clear=
> > > mrc p15, 0, \tmp, c1, c0, 0
> > > .ifnc \set,
> > > orr \tmp, \set
> > > .endif
> > > .ifnc \clear,
> > > mvn \clear, \clear
> > > and \tmp, \tmp, \clear
> >
> > Can't you use bic here?
>
> Yeah.
>
> > > .endif
> > > mcr p15, 0, \tmp, c1, c0, 0
> > > .endm
> > >
> > > With the two call sites in uefi_phys.S as:
> > >
> > > ldr r5, =(CR_M)
> > > update_sctlr r12, , r5
> > > and
> > > ldr r4, =(CR_I | CR_C | CR_M)
> > > update_sctlr r12, r4
> >
> > These ldr= could be movs, right?
>
> The first one could.
> The second one could be movw on armv7+.
>
> > If so, I definitely prefer this to putting an ldr = into the macro itself
> > (option 2).
>
> And your preference between 1) and 2) is?
(1), using bic and mov[tw] where possible.
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list