[PATCH 1/4] ARM: sirf: add two debug ports for CSRatlas7 SoC
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Wed Dec 31 07:31:05 PST 2014
On Wednesday 31 December 2014 23:05:44 Barry Song wrote:
> 2014-12-31 6:35 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>:
> > On Thursday 25 December 2014 16:34:17 Barry Song wrote:
> >> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SIRFPRIMA2_UART1)
> >> -#define SIRFSOC_UART1_PA_BASE 0xb0060000
> >> +#define SIRF_LLUART_PA_BASE 0xb0060000
> >> #elif defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SIRFMARCO_UART1)
> >> -#define SIRFSOC_UART1_PA_BASE 0xcc060000
> >> +#define SIRF_LLUART_PA_BASE 0xcc060000
> >> +#elif defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SIRFATLAS7_UART1)
> >> +#define SIRF_LLUART_PA_BASE 0x18020000
> >> +#elif defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SIRFATLAS7_UART0)
> >> +#define SIRF_LLUART_PA_BASE 0x18010000
> >> #else
> >> -#define SIRFSOC_UART1_PA_BASE 0
> >> +#define SIRF_LLUART_PA_BASE 0
> >> #endif
> >
> > I think it would be nicer to use DEBUG_UART_PHYS/DEBUG_UART_VIRT here.
>
> yes if it is more general name for all. my second feeling is that does
> this conflict CSR namespace stuff into high-level and common namespace
> things?
I think my comment was misleading. What I meant was to use
CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_PHYS from arch/arm/Kconfig.debug the same way
we do for the 8250 and pl011 compatible uarts.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list