[PATCH v6 2/4] net: moxa: replace build_skb() with netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() / memcpy()
David Laight
David.Laight at ACULAB.COM
Tue Aug 26 02:10:19 PDT 2014
From: Arnd Bergmann
> On Monday 25 August 2014 16:22:22 Jonas Jensen wrote:
> > @@ -226,13 +226,15 @@ static int moxart_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> > if (len > RX_BUF_SIZE)
> > len = RX_BUF_SIZE;
> >
> > - skb = build_skb(priv->rx_buf[rx_head], priv->rx_buf_size);
> > + skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(ndev, len);
> > +
> > if (unlikely(!skb)) {
> > - net_dbg_ratelimited("build_skb failed\n");
> > + net_dbg_ratelimited("netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align failed\n");
> > priv->stats.rx_dropped++;
> > priv->stats.rx_errors++;
> > }
> >
> > + memcpy(skb->data, priv->rx_buf[rx_head], len);
Is this memcpy() aligned?
If the hardware can receive to a 4n+2 offset it is probably better to
copy the two bytes before the frame data and to round the length of to
a whole number of words.
> > skb_put(skb, len);
> > skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev);
> > napi_gro_receive(&priv->napi, skb);
>
> While this seems correct, I wonder why you don't do the normal approach of
> dequeuing the skb from the chain and adding a newly allocated skb to it to
> save the memcpy.
Because the receive buffer area isn't made of skbs.
Post-allocating the skb also reduces the 'true size' of the skb.
David
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list