[PATCH 7/9] ARM: sunxi: dt: Add PLL2 support
Chen-Yu Tsai
wens at csie.org
Sun Aug 3 08:55:39 PDT 2014
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:46:09PM -0400, jonsmirl at gmail.com wrote:
>> Would it be better to name this "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pll2-clk" instead
>> of "allwinner,sun4i-a10-b-pll2-clk"? By encoding the b in it everyone
>> is going to wonder what to do on the 'c' revision which is the most
>> common revision.
>
> Not really, the way we works usually is that the compatible is the one
> from the first SoC that implemented that IP. If the rev C has the same
> IP than rev B, then we're using the rev B compatible.
>
>>
>> The revision based rename would then be from
>> "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pll2-clk" to "allwinner,sun4i-a10-a-pll2-clk".
>
> Though, I'd agree with you. We should have a single compatible in the
> DT, a generic one, that would trigger the auto-detection, and might
> change it to the rev A one, but the rev B doesn't make much sense.
I agree. The rev B would make people reading the DT wonder what happened
to rev A.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list