[PATCH 7/9] ARM: sunxi: dt: Add PLL2 support
maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com
Sun Aug 3 05:50:41 PDT 2014
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:46:09PM -0400, jonsmirl at gmail.com wrote:
> Would it be better to name this "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pll2-clk" instead
> of "allwinner,sun4i-a10-b-pll2-clk"? By encoding the b in it everyone
> is going to wonder what to do on the 'c' revision which is the most
> common revision.
Not really, the way we works usually is that the compatible is the one
from the first SoC that implemented that IP. If the rev C has the same
IP than rev B, then we're using the rev B compatible.
> The revision based rename would then be from
> "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pll2-clk" to "allwinner,sun4i-a10-a-pll2-clk".
Though, I'd agree with you. We should have a single compatible in the
DT, a generic one, that would trigger the auto-detection, and might
change it to the rev A one, but the rev B doesn't make much sense.
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the linux-arm-kernel