[PATCH 1/4] ARM: shmobile: Ignore callbacks for subsys generic_pm_domain_data

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Wed Apr 30 03:23:08 PDT 2014


On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 30 April 2014 00:45, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > On Friday, April 25, 2014 10:06:51 AM Simon Horman wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> > On 14 April 2014 11:22, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org> wrote:
> >> > > On 14 April 2014 03:20, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
> >> > >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 05:26:41PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> > >>> There are no active users of these callbacks, thus there are no benefit
> >> > >>> of trying to invoke them.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
> >> > >>> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm at gmail.com>
> >> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>
> >> > >>> ---
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I am seeking ack from the SOC maintainers since this needs to go with the other
> >> > >>> patches in this patchset on the PM core.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> In order to reduce the possibility of conflicts I would prefer
> >> > >> to take this patch through my tree.
> >> > >
> >> > > Okay, go ahead!
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Hi Simon,
> >> >
> >> > Just wanted to know, if you decided to queue this patch in your tree.
> >> > Or were there anything else you needed me to fix here?
> >>
> >> Sorry for dropping the ball. I will queue-up this patch.
> >
> > OK
> >
> > Ulf, since the rest of the series depends on this one (or at least that's
> > how it looks to me), would you mind resending it when this one gets into the
> > Linus' tree?
> 
> Well, I would prefer if we could go ahead with the rest of the patches
> somehow for 3.16, but I guess it will be hard if Simon picks up this
> patch!?
> 
> Simon,
> I guess the reason for your concern were about conflicts, but the file
> this patch touch has actually not been modified since Sep 2012. So,
> maybe we could go through Rafaels tree anyway?

Yes, my primary concern was conflicts.
But as you point out that seems unlikely.

I have already picked up the patch but the pull request I sent to
the ARM SoC maintainers has not been pulled. And regardless it
won't appear in Linus's tree via that route until v3.16-rc1.

Perhaps a good way forwards would be for Rafael to also apply the patch
with my Ack. I could also revert the version applied to my tree
if that is of any help.

Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas at verge.net.au>

> I have a bunch of other patches for genpd which I plan to send once
> the first part of clean up patches were merged. Those are likely
> material for 3.17 though.
> 
> Kind regards
> Ulf Hansson
> 
> >
> > --
> > I speak only for myself.
> > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list