ARM: mm: Could I change module space size or place modules in vmalloc area?

Will Deacon will.deacon at arm.com
Tue Apr 29 05:40:16 PDT 2014


On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:35:34PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 April 2014 12:19:46 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 03:12:40AM +0100, Jianguo Wu wrote:
> > > On 2014/1/3 8:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > ARM can only branch relatively within +/- 32MB.  Hence, with a module
> > > > space of 16MB, modules can reach up to a maximum 16MB into the direct-
> > > > mapped kernel image.  As module space increases in size, so that figure
> > > > decreases.  So, if module space were to be 40MB, the maximum size of the
> > > > kernel binary would be 8MB.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Russell ,Arnd or Will,
> > > 
> > > I encountered the same situation in arm64, I loaded 80+ modules in arm64, and
> > > run out of module address space(64M). Why the module space is restricted to 64M,
> > > can it be expanded?  
> > 
> > The module space is restricted to 64M on AArch64 because the range of the BL
> > instruction is += 128M. In order to call kernel functions, we need to ensure
> > that this range is large enough and therefore place the modules 64M below the
> > kernel text, allowing 64M for modules and 64M for the kernel text. We could
> > probably improve this a bit by assuming a maximum size for the kernel text.
> > 
> > If we want to remove the problem altogether, we'd need to hack the module
> > loader to insert trampolines (fiddly) or somehow persuade the tools to use
> > indirect branches (BLR) for all calls (inefficient).
> 
> Well, there might also be a bug involved. Loading 80 modules should never
> take up 64MB. The typical size of a loadable module should be a few dozen
> kilobytes, although we have a few modules that are hundreds of kilobytes.
> 
> Jianguo Wu, can you send the defconfig you were using? Did you have
> some debugging option enabled that increased the module size?

If 64K pages are in use we could end up with a tonne of fragmentation but
yes, worth looking at the .config.

Will



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list