[PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: DRA7: Add support for soc_is_dra74x() and soc_is_dra72x() varients
Rajendra Nayak
rnayak at ti.com
Tue Apr 29 04:19:59 PDT 2014
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 04:48 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 April 2014 16:35:13 Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> @@ -393,7 +395,12 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX)
>> #undef soc_is_dra7xx
>> +#undef soc_is_dra74x
>> +#undef soc_is_dra72x
>> #define soc_is_dra7xx() (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra7"))
>> +#define soc_is_dra74x() (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra74"))
>> +#define soc_is_dra72x() (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra72"))
>> +
>
> You shouldn't normally have to define these. Why are they needed?
>
> Maybe it's better to wait for a user to show up, and then we can decide
> whether we actually want to have them this way, or if there is a better
> solution for the particular use case.
>
> Normally, we'd want to make run-time decisions based on properties
> of the nodes a driver is working on, not the global machine compatible
> string.
Yeah, actually this can be dropped. There is no user for it now.
>
> Arnd
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list