[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Remove exynos_sort_descend_freq_table in exynos5440-cpufreq.c
jhbird.choi at samsung.com
Tue Apr 29 00:05:28 PDT 2014
Thanks to Amit Kachhap & Viresh Kumar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Viresh Kumar [mailto:viresh.kumar at linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 3:21 PM
> To: Amit Kachhap
> Cc: Jonghwan Choi; Kukjin Kim; linux-samsung-soc; Rafael J. Wysocki;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRI...
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Remove exynos_sort_descend_freq_table in
> On 29 April 2014 11:44, Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In the frequency table dts file, the frequencies are arranged in
> > descending order which maps 1 to 1 with other frequency parameter to
> > be calculated and programmed in some registers.
> > But the OPP library works by generating the frequencies in ascending
> > order which breaks the above logic. Ideally i should expect frequency
> > values in same order as what is supplied.
> > So OPP library should not change the order or should take input flags
> > flags like, dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(TABLE_ORDER_ASCEND|
> > TABLE_ORDER_DESCEND|TABLE_ORDER_ORIGINAL )
> Looks a good idea :)
> This is what I wrote in another thread:
> What I would recommend is, use .driver_data field to hold what has to be
> written to hardware for any frequency. And then simply use driver_data
> instead of index.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel