[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Remove exynos_sort_descend_freq_table in exynos5440-cpufreq.c

[Viresh Kumar]

On 29 April 2014 10:54, Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi at samsung.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
> -static void exynos_sort_descend_freq_table(void)
> -{
> -       struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_tbl = dvfs_info->freq_table;
> -       int i = 0, index;
> -       unsigned int tmp_freq;
> -       /*
> -        * Exynos5440 clock controller state logic expects the cpufreq table
> to
> -        * be in descending order. But the OPP library constructs the table
> in
> -        * ascending order. So to make the table descending we just need to
> -        * swap the i element with the N - i element.
> -        */

What I am more focused is on: Why do we need to worry about order at
all in the first place.

Okay, above comment says something about it but I couldn't understand
what's the logic behind that. Why do we need same order as of clock
controller. Please point out relevant code pieces as well..

@Amit: Your comments on this ?