[PATCH v8 3/3] ARM: Check if a CPU has gone offline

Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall at linaro.org
Mon Apr 28 06:06:39 PDT 2014


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:03:23PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/04/2014 14:23, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
> >Are they inter-dependent?  I thought your patches depended on Anup's -
> >not the other way around?
> >
> >If my assumption is correct, I think we can make sure to send the pull
> >request to kvm/next early and ask Catalin to pull in kvm/next before
> >pulling your changes.
> >
> >I'm cc'ing both Catalin and Paolo here for their advice.
> 
> Is Anup's patchset already on a branch?  If you send me a pointer to
> it I can look at that branch history and see what's best.
> 
I didn't merge it yet - need to make one final pass over it (likely
later tonight).

But this is the series:
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2014-April/009061.html

I believe Ashwin's patch set depends only on "ARM/ARM64: KVM: Add common
header for PSCI related defines".

Thanks,
-Christoffer



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list