[PATCH] perf: ARM64: wire up perf_regs and unwind support

Jean Pihet jean.pihet at linaro.org
Mon Apr 28 02:15:43 PDT 2014


Arnaldo,

> This patch hooks in the perf_regs and libunwind code for ARM64.
> The tools/perf/arch/arm64 is created; it contains the arch specific
> code for DWARF unwinding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet at linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>

Ping on this patch. Can you take this patch in your tree?
Please let me know if you need a rebased version of this one.

Regards,
Jean

On 13 March 2014 13:01, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 13 March 2014 11:22, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:12:02AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:45:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
>>> > > On 13 February 2014 18:06, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet at linaro.org> wrote:
>>> > > > This patch hooks in the perf_regs and libunwind code for ARM64.
>>> > > > The tools/perf/arch/arm64 is created; it contains the arch specific
>>> > > > code for DWARF unwinding.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet at linaro.org>
>>> > > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
>>> > >
>>> > > Ping on this patch. Can this one go into the perf tree?
>>> >
>>> > I'm happy to take it as well if there are no objections from the perf
>>> > maintainers.
>>>
>>> I object :) Last time I took a patch for perf tools (via the arm tree) it
>>> ended in a conflict from hell and we vowed not to take tools patches via
>>> arch trees again.
>>
>> Works for me ;)
> Ok thanks!
>
> Arnaldo, can you take this patch in your tree?
>
> Jean
>
>>
>> --
>> Catalin



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list