[PATCH v2 1/2] usb: ohci-exynos: Add facility to use phy provided by the generic phy framework

[Alan Stern]

On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:

> Add support to consume phy provided by Generic phy framework.
> Keeping the support for older usb-phy intact right now, in order
> to prevent any functionality break in absence of relevant
> device tree side change for ohci-exynos.
> Once we move to new phy in the device nodes for ohci, we can
> remove the support for older phys.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek at samsung.com>
> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han at samsung.com>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern at rowland.harvard.edu>


> +static int exynos_ohci_phyg_on(struct phy *phy[])
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; ret == 0 && i < PHY_NUMBER; i++)
> +		if (phy[i])
> +			ret = phy_power_on(phy[i]);
> +	if (ret)
> +		for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> +			if (phy[i])
> +				phy_power_off(phy[i]);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int exynos_ohci_phyg_off(struct phy *phy[])
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; ret == 0 && i < PHY_NUMBER; i++)
> +		if (phy[i])
> +			ret = phy_power_off(phy[i]);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

You probably shouldn't break out of this loop if ret is nonzero; you
should continue to power off the remaining phys.

I'd be inclined to put these two routines directly into 
exynos_ohci_phy_enable() and exynos_ohci_phy_disable(), since they 
aren't used anywhere else.

> @@ -151,6 +253,7 @@ skip_phy:
>  
>  fail_add_hcd:
>  	exynos_ohci_phy_disable(pdev);
> +	exynos_ohci_phyg_off(exynos_ohci->phy_g);

Why did you add this line?  It doesn't do anything useful, because 
exynos_ohci_phy_disable() already calls exynos_ohci_phyg_off().

Alan Stern