[PATCH] arm: dts: am43x-clock: add tbclk data for ehrpwm.

sourav sourav.poddar at ti.com
Thu Apr 24 22:42:39 PDT 2014


Hi Tero,

On Tuesday 22 April 2014 06:11 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 04/22/2014 01:25 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
>> We need "tblclk" clock data for the functioning of ehrpwm
>> module. Hence, populating the required clock information
>> in clock dts file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar at ti.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi |   84 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c            |    6 +++
>>   2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
>> index 142009c..869f9a5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
>> @@ -87,6 +87,90 @@
>>           clock-mult = <1>;
>>           clock-div = <1>;
>>       };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
>> +        ti,bit-shift = <0>;
>> +        reg = <0x0664>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm0_tbclk: ehrpwm0_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk>;
>> +    };
>
> Why do you use composite-clock type here? I see only add one sub-clock 
> to the composite, thus the composite part is unused. How about using a 
> gate-clock type only? Same question applies for the rest of the patch 
> also.
>

Yes, I though of doing so and I think it should be fine to use 
gate-clock only. I did this following the ehrpwm clock data in
"am33xx-clock.dtsi" file, where we use composite clock for ehrpwm. I 
think it needs to be changed there also.?

-Sourav
> -Tero
>
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
>> +        ti,bit-shift = <1>;
>> +        reg = <0x0664>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm1_tbclk: ehrpwm1_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
>> +        ti,bit-shift = <2>;
>> +        reg = <0x0664>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm2_tbclk: ehrpwm2_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm3_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm3_gate_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
>> +        ti,bit-shift = <2>;
>> +        reg = <0x0664>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm3_tbclk: ehrpwm3_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&ehrpwm3_gate_tbclk>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm4_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm4_gate_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
>> +        ti,bit-shift = <2>;
>> +        reg = <0x0664>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm4_tbclk: ehrpwm4_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&ehrpwm4_gate_tbclk>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm5_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm5_gate_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
>> +        ti,bit-shift = <2>;
>> +        reg = <0x0664>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    ehrpwm5_tbclk: ehrpwm5_tbclk {
>> +        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +        compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
>> +        clocks = <&ehrpwm5_gate_tbclk>;
>> +    };
>>   };
>> &prcm_clocks {
>>       clk_32768_ck: clk_32768_ck {
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c
>> index 67c8de5..5413a6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c
>> @@ -105,6 +105,12 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk am43xx_clks[] = {
>>       DT_CLK(NULL, "func_12m_clk", "func_12m_clk"),
>>       DT_CLK(NULL, "vtp_clk_div", "vtp_clk_div"),
>>       DT_CLK(NULL, "usbphy_32khz_clkmux", "usbphy_32khz_clkmux"),
>> +    DT_CLK("48300200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm0_tbclk"),
>> +    DT_CLK("48302200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm1_tbclk"),
>> +    DT_CLK("48304200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm2_tbclk"),
>> +    DT_CLK("48306200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm0_tbclk"),
>> +    DT_CLK("48308200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm1_tbclk"),
>> +    DT_CLK("4830a200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm2_tbclk"),
>>       { .node_name = NULL },
>>   };
>>
>>
>




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list