[PATCH v8 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: initial board support for exynos5260 SoC

[Rahul Sharma]

Hi Kukjin,

Need this macro to enable build for clock driver.

Regards,
Rahul Sharma.


On 22 April 2014 15:36, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
> Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> On 16.04.2014 10:08, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> > Hi Tomasz,
>> >
>> > On 16 April 2014 13:27, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Rahul,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 16.04.2014 05:58, Rahul Sharma wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey at samsung.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> This patch add basic arch side support for exynos5260 SoC.
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey at samsung.com>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma at samsung.com>
>> >>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
>> >>> ---
>> >>>    arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig |    5 +++++
>> >>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>> >>>
>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-
>> exynos/Kconfig
>> >>> index fc8bf18..bf4ed87 100644
>> >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
>> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
>> >>> @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5250
>> >>>          help
>> >>>            Enable EXYNOS5250 SoC support
>> >>>
>> >>> +config SOC_EXYNOS5260
>> >>> +       bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5260"
>> >>> +       default y
>> >>> +       depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5
>> >>> +
>> >>>    config SOC_EXYNOS5420
>> >>>          bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5420"
>> >>>          default y
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Is this patch necessary now? After Sachin's consolidation series there
>> are
>> >> no per SoC entries anymore.
>> >
>> > Kukjin still wanted individual SoCs to be selectable. Please refer [1].
>> >
>> > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg27040.html
>>
>> I don't think any valid reason was presented there. Features in code
>> should not be selected using #ifdef CONFIG_ anymore, so I don't really
>> see any reason to not proceed with this consolidation. Olof, Arnd?
>>
> Hi,
>
> Yeah, in this case, nothing happened with adding SOC_EXYNOS5260. So I don't have any idea why this is required.
>
> - Kukjin
>