[PATCH v2] staging: imx-drm-core: skip components whose parent device is disabled

Olof Johansson olof at lixom.net
Mon Apr 21 07:22:52 PDT 2014


On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at freescale.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 09:42:29AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 01:53:08PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> > BTW, can you take a look at the following two patches, or are they
>> > already in your queue?
>> >
>> > imx-drm: imx-drm-core: Fix imx_drm_encoder_get_mux_id
>> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/7/58
>>
>> This one now is.
>>
>> > mx-drm: imx-tve: correct DDC property name to 'ddc-i2c-bus'
>> > ('i' is missing from the prefix word, and it should be 'imx-drm')
>> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg321057.html
>>
>> This one touches arch/arm/boot/dts, which Arnd moaned at me for touching
>> via the staging tree during the merge window.  So, while I can take the
>> imx-tve part, I can't take the arch/arm/boot/dts part.  This patch needs
>> to be split.
>>
>> It also means that the MBA platform will have its TVE output broken while
>> the two commits take their different paths, but I guess that's what you
>> get for this kind of sillyness about git trees having exclusive ownership
>> of various files in the kernel tree - more breakage not less.
>
> I think Arnd's main concern is about merge conflict, which shouldn't be
> a problem for this particular case.  The change on dts file is pretty
> trivial.  And I assume this is a fix to be landed on mainline before
> -rc5 or so.  Then I can rebase my DT branch on top of it.  That said,
> merge conflict is not really a problem for this patch.  Arnd?

I'm not Arnd, but that should work well.


-Olof



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list