[PATCH 0/4] pinctrl: sirf: switch to one gpiolib and gpiolib_irqchip helpers
Barry Song
21cnbao at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 03:05:04 PDT 2014
2014-04-16 17:54 GMT+08:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at dowhile0.org>:
> Hello Barry,
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Barry Song <21cnbao at gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Barry Song <Baohua.Song at csr.com>
>>
>> This patchset depends on Linus Walleij's "pinctrl: sirf: rename inlined accessor".
>> and "pinctrl: sirf: switch driver to use gpiolib irqchip helpers" is rebased
>> from Linus Walleij's patch too.
>>
>> Barry Song (3):
>> pinctrl: sirf: wrap all gpio banks into one gpio_chip
>> gpio: make handler_data configurable while using gpiolib_irqchip
>> pinctrl: sirf: move to use irq_get_handler_data
>> Linus Walleij (1):
>> pinctrl: sirf: switch driver to use gpiolib irqchip helpers
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 10 +-
>> drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/pinctrl/sirf/pinctrl-sirf.c | 264 ++++++++++++-----------------------
>> include/linux/gpio/driver.h | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 180 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Maybe you can first do the parameter change to
> gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip() and then just convert to gpiolib
> irqchip passing the struct sirfsoc_gpio_bank pointer instead of a
> struct gpio_chip. I think there is no need to split PATCH 2 and PATCH
> 4 but it is up to you.
>
Javier, thanks. the reason for splitting 2 and 4 is that i don't want
to lose the contribution of Linus for "gpiolib irqchip helpers".
otherwise, i will be the author of the merged patch.
> The series looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at dowhile0.org>
-barry
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list