[PATCH v8 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: initial board support for exynos5260 SoC
tomasz.figa at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 01:10:15 PDT 2014
On 16.04.2014 10:08, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
> On 16 April 2014 13:27, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>> On 16.04.2014 05:58, Rahul Sharma wrote:
>>> From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey at samsung.com>
>>> This patch add basic arch side support for exynos5260 SoC.
>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey at samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma at samsung.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
>>> index fc8bf18..bf4ed87 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
>>> @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5250
>>> Enable EXYNOS5250 SoC support
>>> +config SOC_EXYNOS5260
>>> + bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5260"
>>> + default y
>>> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5
>>> config SOC_EXYNOS5420
>>> bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5420"
>>> default y
>> Is this patch necessary now? After Sachin's consolidation series there are
>> no per SoC entries anymore.
> Kukjin still wanted individual SoCs to be selectable. Please refer .
>  http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg27040.html
I don't think any valid reason was presented there. Features in code
should not be selected using #ifdef CONFIG_ anymore, so I don't really
see any reason to not proceed with this consolidation. Olof, Arnd?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel