Device tree support for Atmel AC97 controller on AT91SAM9263
Takashi Iwai
tiwai at suse.de
Mon Apr 14 22:59:36 PDT 2014
At Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:47:11 +0200,
Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>
> On 14/04/2014 at 20:43:02 +0200, Alexander Stein wrote :
> > Hello Takashi,
> >
> > On Monday 14 April 2014, 10:42:06 wrote Takashi Iwai:
> > > At Sat, 12 Apr 2014 11:08:23 +0200,
> > > Alexander Stein wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This set of patches add device tree support for the AC97 controller found
> > > > on AT91SAM9263.
> > > > The first two patches are minor cleanup, while the last ones add the
> > actual
> > > > support.
> > >
> > > Do you really need work on this driver? The sound/atmel/* stuff is an
> > > old one before ASoC was introduced, mostly obsoleted nowadays.
> >
> > Ah, ok. I wasn't aware of that. But is there a replacement for the ac97c
> > driver? All I found in sound/soc/atmel is using the SSC peripheral. Not
> > something I can use.
>
> I guess what Takashi wanted to say was: shouldn't we rewrite the driver
> completely to take advantage of the ASoC infrastructure ?
Yep, exactly. Thanks for my sparse word completion :)
> I'm actually quite interesting in getting it to work as this is the la
> peripheral that doesn't have DT support on the SAM9RL.
>
> I'll make some comments on your patches but I'm not sure whether we
> should keep that driver or move to ASoC. Maybe that could be an
> intermediate step. I'll try to have a look this week.
OK, if people think it's still useful, I can take the patches without
problems. The changes are small and easy enough. But, the only
condition is that it's assured that the changes / binding is
applicable to ASoC (in future, if any). That said, it'd be great if
anyone can work on the proper integration to ASoC at the same time.
thanks,
Takashi
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list