[PATCH 20/29] ARM: orion5x: convert edmini_v2 to DT pinctrl
Ezequiel Garcia
ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com
Mon Apr 14 05:24:40 PDT 2014
On Apr 14, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:27:41PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > On 04/14/2014 01:23 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > >Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,
> > >
> > >On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:51:24 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > >
> > >>> internal-regs {
> > >>>+ pinctrl at 10000 {
> > >>
> > >>Use node label reference:
> > >>
> > >>&pinctrl {
> > >> ...
> > >>};
> > >
> > >I personally dislike using node label references. I know they are used
> > >for Ethernet because it has been done by someone else for Orion
> > >platforms. But on all Armada 370/XP platforms, we don't use node label
> > >references, and I'd prefer to do it the same way for Orion5x platforms
> > >if possible.
> >
> > Well, I definitely disagree and would like to _enforce_ using node
> > label references. Anyway, if there is a strong reason for not using
> > them, I'd be fine too.
>
> Hi Sebastian, Thomas
>
> Could you both explain your like/dislike for using node labels.
>
Aside from aesthetical reasons, let me add a fact in favor of node labels.
When we added the MBus devicetree we had to do some intrusive and error-prone
node relocations, such as:
de1af8d486ae05922efbb69b93b902b197dfaca9
These changes would have been much simpler by using node labels, probably
one-liners.
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list