[PATCH 3/5] ARM: EXYNOS5420: Add IO mapping for non-secure SYSRAM

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 14 April 2014 12:25:20 Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:31:49PM +0530, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
> > On the Exynos5420 non-secure SYSRAM is used for secondary CPU bring-up,
> > so add a mapping for it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab at samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan at samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c           |   11 +++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h |    1 +
> >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> > index b32a907..b1cf9d5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> > @@ -159,6 +159,15 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5250_iodesc[] __initdata = {
> >       },
> >  };
> >  
> > +static struct map_desc exynos5420_iodesc[] __initdata = {
> > +     {
> > +             .virtual        = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS,
> > +             .pfn            = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS5420_PA_SYSRAM_NS),
> > +             .length         = SZ_4K,
> > +             .type           = MT_DEVICE,
> > +     },
> > +};
> > +
> 
> Regarding Arnd's NAK in
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/246936.html,
> this looks like another instance of the same thing.
> 
> Arnd, what was your preferred solution?  Should this be described in DT?

Yes. There are already patches on the list to do this right.

	Arnd