[PATCH V4 10/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move clock setup to pm.c

[Tomasz Figa]

On 11.04.2014 10:30, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 05:34 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On 10.04.2014 16:23, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 04/10/2014 03:57 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> On 10.04.2014 11:55, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>> One more step is moving the clock ratio setting at idle time in pm.c
>>>>>
>>>>> The macro names have been changed to be consistent with the other
>>>>> macros
>>>>> name in the file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note, the clock divider was working only when cpuidle was enabled
>>>>> because it
>>>>> was in its init routine. With this change, the clock divider is set in
>>>>> the pm's
>>>>> init routine, so it will also operate when the cpuidle driver is not
>>>>> set, which
>>>>> is good.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie at samsung.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c  |   54
>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c       |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h |   19 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>   3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Sorry that I didn't mention that before, but now I recall that there
>>>> was
>>>> already a similar patch moving this code to Exynos5250 clock driver,
>>>> which is the best place for setup of any CMU registers and a step
>>>> towards removing one more static IO mapping.
>>>
>>> Yes, Bartlomiej mentioned it.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to merge this mentioned patch or to give a pointer to it
>>> so I can integrate it into the patchset ?
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138147021207626&w=2
>>
>> I wonder if it still applies cleanly, though...
>
> Ok, if I refer to the date, this patch has been lost in the limbus. So I
> can integrate it with my patchset without conflicting with any tree.
> Right ?
>

As I suspected, it doesn't apply onto current sources. I have attached a 
rebased version. Feel free to send it as a part of next version of your 
series.

Best regards,
Tomasz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-ARM-EXYNOS-Move-arm-core-power-down-clock-to-exynos5.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 6226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140411/1ad9e7d6/attachment.bin>