[PATCH 2/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Staticize exynos_subsys
Tomasz Figa
t.figa at samsung.com
Thu Apr 10 05:32:04 PDT 2014
On 10.04.2014 11:22, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On 10 April 2014 14:47, Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Sachin,
>>
>>
>> On 10.04.2014 10:24, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>>
>>> 'exynos_subsys' is now local to this file. Make it static
>>> and remove the declaration from header file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h | 1 -
>>> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>>> index 6a5fe18ec9b1..0ef42b9efd36 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
>>> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>>> of_scan_flat_dt(exynos_fdt_map_sysram, NULL);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -struct bus_type exynos_subsys = {
>>> +static struct bus_type exynos_subsys = {
>>> .name = "exynos-core",
>>> .dev_name = "exynos-core",
>>> };
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h
>>> b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h
>>> index 5992b8dd9b89..930b4be832cd 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h
>>> @@ -239,7 +239,6 @@ extern struct bus_type s3c2443_subsys;
>>> extern struct bus_type s3c6410_subsys;
>>> extern struct bus_type s5p64x0_subsys;
>>> extern struct bus_type s5pv210_subsys;
>>> -extern struct bus_type exynos_subsys;
>>>
>>> extern void (*s5pc1xx_idle)(void);
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This struct and registration of it do not seem to be needed for anything
>> anymore. Would you consider removing it instead?
>
> I had considered removing that while I was doing other code consolidation
> of this file. However I found that without this, the system failed to boot. I
> did not look much into it then. Probably I can revisit it and if it
> doesn't cause
> any boot issue, will remove it.
>
Hmm, I don't see why it could break anything as I can't find any users
of it. Anyway I just tested removing this code on Exynos4412-trats2
board and didn't find any problems.
Best regards,
Tomasz
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list