[PATCH v12][ 07/12] drm: drm_display_mode: add signal polarity flags

[Andrzej Hajda]

On 04/08/2014 10:08 AM, Denis Carikli wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 08:36 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>
>> Hi Denis,
> Hi,
> 
>>> +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE	BIT(1)
>>> +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_PIXDATA_POSEDGE	BIT(2)
>>> +#define DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_PIXDATA_PRESERVE	BIT(3)
>>
>> What is the purpose of DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_PIXDATA_PRESERVE?
>> If 'preserve' means 'ignore' we can set to zero negedge and posedge bits
>> instead of adding new bit. If it is something different please describe it.
> Yes, it meant 'ignore'.
> 
> The goal was to be able to have a way to keep the old behavior while 
> still being able to set the flags.
> 
> So, with the imx-drm driver, if none of the DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_PIXDATA 
> were set(that is POSEDGE, NEGEDGE, PRESERVE), then in ipuv3-crtc.c, it 
> went using the old flags settings that were previously hardcoded.
> 
> The same applied for DRM_MODE_FLAG_POL_DE.
> The patch using theses flags is the 08/12 of this same serie.

So as I understand you want to:
- do not change hw polarity settings by using preserve bit,
- keep the old behavior of the driver by setting all bits to zero.

I think this is the issue of the specific driver, and it should not
influence core structs.

I am not familiar with imx but I guess it should not be a problem
to solve the issue in the driver.

> 
>>>   struct drm_display_mode {
> [..]
>>> +	unsigned int pol_flags;
>>
>> Adding field and macros description to the DocBook would be nice.
> So I will have to describe it in the "Connector Helper Operations" 
> section of drm.tmpl, right before the mode_valid synopsis ?

Yes, I think so.

Andrzej

> 
> Denis.
>