mach header files
Barry Song
21cnbao at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 06:32:33 PDT 2014
2014-04-04 21:24 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>:
> On Friday 04 April 2014 03:29:54 Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy at renesas.com> wrote:
>> > Resent, hopefully without the automatic corporate signature appended this time...
>> >
>> > I am porting the kernel to a new device, for which I've created a new
>> > arch/arm/mach-... directory, and I also a clock driver that lives under
>> > driver/clk. Everything is all working fine, though I am now cleaning up
>> > the code and have a question about mach specific header files.
>
> I'm glad you are asking while you are still in the process of cleaning
> up your code, because you need to know the rules for new platforms.
> Basically at this point we expect zero code in arch/arm/mach-* for a new
> platform. You are absolutely required to have DT based probing and
> multiplatform support, and the latter also means that there are no
> mach/*.h header files that are visible to device drivers.
>
> We still make the occasional exception for adding code in the mach-*
> directory, but we are getting pretty close to the state where this
> is not needed for new platforms, and all the existing uses are for
> things that can eventually get cleaned up.
> If you think you need an exception here, please explain what you
> are doing, and we can see if there is a better way to do that already.
Arnd, my question is that mach-prima2/common.c has supported prima2,
atlas6, marco, what if i add an atlas7 support in it?
-barry
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list