[PATCH] arm: don't allow CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX if CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL is enabled
Alexander Holler
holler at ahsoftware.de
Tue Apr 1 11:53:31 PDT 2014
Am 01.04.2014 20:36, schrieb Kees Cook:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Laura Abbott <lauraa at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 4/1/2014 3:04 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX sounds like a nice security feature, but
>>> things might fail late (and unexpected) if module code is set to read-only
>>> while CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL is enabled (e.g. modprobe bridge).
>
> Isn't this a ordering problem? I thought jump labels got set up once,
> and then after that, the memory could be made RO?
I basically just run into that and looked up what happened. But the
problem appears e.g. in netfiler/core.c function nf_register_hook()
which calls static_key_slow_inc(). So you would have to make sure
nf_register_hook() will be called before the code is set ro. Something
that doesn't look easy to do.
I would have to look up when that might be called, but I assume there
are many ways to register and unregister hooks in netfilter and some of
them might happen outside any init, probe or whatever one might set the
code read-only afterwards. You would have to set the code rw too, before
nf_unregister_hook() happens.
Maybe it's possible to mark some modules to not become ro at all, I
don't know. And doing so would make them a prefered target for exploits.
So I'm not sure if it would make sense.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list