[PATCH v4 06/11] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: AM43x powerdomain data

[Afzal Mohammed]

Hi Paul,

On Monday 30 September 2013 03:57 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Afzal Mohammed wrote:

>> From: Ambresh K <ambresh at ti.com>
>>
>> Add the data file to describe all power domains in AM43x SoC.
>> OMAP4 powerdomain operations is being reused here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ambresh K <ambresh at ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <afzal at ti.com>
> 
> ...
> 
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains43xx_data.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static struct powerdomain per_43xx_pwrdm = {
>> +	.name		  = "per_pwrdm",
>> +	.voltdm		  = { .name = "core" },
>> +	.prcm_offs	  = AM43XX_PRM_PER_INST,
>> +	.prcm_partition	  = AM43XX_PRM_PARTITION,
>> +	.pwrsts		  = PWRSTS_OFF_RET_ON,
>> +	.pwrsts_logic_ret = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,
>> +	.banks		  = 4,
>> +	.pwrsts_mem_ret	= {
>> +		[0] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,	/* icss_mem */
>> +		[1] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,	/* per_mem */
>> +		[2] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,	/* ram1_mem */
>> +		[3] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,	/* ram2_mem */
>> +	},
>> +	.pwrsts_mem_on	= {
>> +		[0] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,	/* icss_mem */
>> +		[1] = PWRSTS_ON,	/* per_mem */
>> +		[2] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,	/* ram1_mem */
>> +		[3] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,	/* ram2_mem */
>> +	},
>> +	.flags		  = PWRDM_HAS_LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE,
>> +};
> 
> The pwrsts_mem_on flags don't make any sense here for banks 0, 2, and 3.  
> They claim that those banks can never be turned on.  Could you please 
> doublecheck these?

Checked it, they should be PWRSTS_ON, I will fix it.

Regards
Afzal