[PATCH 11/26] ARM: dove: remove custom .init_time hook

[Sebastian Hesselbarth]

On 09/23/2013 03:32 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>> On 09/21/2013 02:22 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:53:44PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>>>> With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init(), we can now
>>>>> remove custom .init_time hooks. While at it, also remove some obsolete
>>>>> includes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net>
>>>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
>>>>> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason at lakedaemon.net>
>>>>> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
>>>>> Cc: Russell King <linux at arm.linux.org.uk>
>>>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>>>> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   arch/arm/mach-dove/board-dt.c |   11 -----------
>>>>>   1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
>>> [...]
>>>> Boot tested on cubox.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
>>>
>>> Thanks Andrew!
>>>
>>> Aren't you giving any Acks for dove/kirkwood anymore?
>>
>> Hi Sebastian
>>
>> In my opinion, a Tested-by: has more weight than an Acked-by. I could
>> of given you an Acked-by in about 60 seconds, given the simplicity of
>> the patch. It took a lot more effort to get your tree, build it, fix
>> my binutils, since it was the first 3.12 tree i had tried and my
>> binutils was too old, and boot it.
>
> I would even go so far as to say that a Tested-by: from a maintainer
> carries an implied Ack.  ;-)
>
> And, just for the record,
>
> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason at lakedaemon.net>

True, True, True. Lesson learned ;)

Thanks for both testing and ack'ing.

Sebastian