[RFC PATCH 08/15] ata: ahci_platform: Manage SATA PHY
Sergei Shtylyov
sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com
Sun Sep 22 14:22:31 EDT 2013
Hello.
On 09/19/2013 05:05 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> From: Balaji T K <balajitk at ti.com>
> Some platforms have a PHY hooked up to the
> SATA controller. The PHY needs to be initialized
> and powered up for SATA to work. We do that
> using the PHY framework.
> [Roger Q] Cleaned up.
> CC: Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.h b/drivers/ata/ahci.h
> index 1145637..94484cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.h
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/libata.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
struct phy;
should suffice.
> @@ -322,6 +323,7 @@ struct ahci_host_priv {
> u32 em_buf_sz; /* EM buffer size in byte */
> u32 em_msg_type; /* EM message type */
> struct clk *clk; /* Only for platforms supporting clk */
> + struct phy *phy; /* If platforms use phy */
> void *plat_data; /* Other platform data */
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> index 2daaee0..f812ffa 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/libata.h>
> #include <linux/ahci_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
Why include it from both ahci.h and here?
> #include "ahci.h"
>
> static void ahci_host_stop(struct ata_host *host);
> @@ -141,16 +142,32 @@ static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> + hpriv->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "sata-phy");
> + if (IS_ERR(hpriv->phy)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't get phy\n");
Don't think it's a good idea to complain about missing PHY when the driver
doesn't even use it.
> + /* return only if -EPROBE_DEFER */
> + if (PTR_ERR(hpriv->phy) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> + rc = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + goto disable_unprepare_clk;
> + }
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Some platforms might need to prepare for mmio region access,
> * which could be done in the following init call. So, the mmio
> * region shouldn't be accessed before init (if provided) has
> * returned successfully.
> */
> +
> + if (!(IS_ERR(hpriv->phy))) {
() not needed around IS_ERR() invocation.
> + phy_init(hpriv->phy);
> + phy_power_on(hpriv->phy);
> + }
> +
I think this is misplaced, i.e. it should precede the comment.
> if (pdata && pdata->init) {
> rc = pdata->init(dev, hpriv->mmio);
> if (rc)
> - goto disable_unprepare_clk;
> + goto disable_phy;
> }
>
> ahci_save_initial_config(dev, hpriv,
[...]
> @@ -328,6 +356,7 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ahci_pm_ops, ahci_suspend, ahci_resume);
> static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "snps,spear-ahci", },
> { .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", },
> + { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", },
Looks like the binding documentation is incomplete -- it doesn't list
"snps,exynos5440-ahci"...
WBR, Sergei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list