[PATCH 7/7] drivers: phy: renamed struct omap_control_usb to struct omap_control_phy

Kishon Vijay Abraham I kishon at ti.com
Sun Sep 15 23:06:40 EDT 2013


On Thursday 12 September 2013 07:12 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/02/2013 06:43 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> renamed struct omap_control_usb to struct omap_control_phy since it can
>> be used to control PHY of USB, SATA and PCIE. Also moved the driver and
>> include files under *phy* and made the corresponding changes in the users
>> of phy-omap-control.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/phy/Kconfig                                |   14 +-
>>   drivers/phy/Makefile                               |    1 +
>>   drivers/{usb => }/phy/phy-omap-control.c           |  164 ++++++++++----------
>>   drivers/phy/phy-omap-pipe3.c                       |    8 +-
>>   drivers/phy/phy-omap-usb2.c                        |    8 +-
>>   drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c                        |    2 +-
>>   drivers/usb/phy/Makefile                           |    1 -
>>   .../omap_control_usb.h => phy/omap_control_phy.h}  |   32 ++--
>>   8 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
>>   rename drivers/{usb => }/phy/phy-omap-control.c (55%)
>>   rename include/linux/{usb/omap_control_usb.h => phy/omap_control_phy.h} (69%)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> index 5c2e7a0..fd11294 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> @@ -15,12 +15,22 @@ config GENERIC_PHY
>>   	  phy users can obtain reference to the PHY. All the users of this
>>   	  framework should select this config.
>>
>> +config OMAP_CONTROL_PHY
>> +	tristate "OMAP CONTROL PHY Driver"
>> +	depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST
>> +	help
>> +	  Enable this to add support for the PHY part present in the control
>> +	  module. This driver has API to power on the USB2 PHY and to write to
>> +	  the mailbox. The mailbox is present only in omap4 and the register to
>> +	  power on the USB2 PHY is present in OMAP4 and OMAP5. OMAP5 has
>> +	  additional registers to power on PIPE3 PHYs.
>> +
>>   config OMAP_USB2
>>   	tristate "OMAP USB2 PHY Driver"
>>   	depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
>>   	select GENERIC_PHY
>>   	select USB_PHY
>> -	select OMAP_CONTROL_USB
>> +	select OMAP_CONTROL_PHY
>>   	help
>>   	  Enable this to support the transceiver that is part of SOC. This
>>   	  driver takes care of all the PHY functionality apart from comparator.
>> @@ -30,7 +40,7 @@ config OMAP_USB2
>>   config OMAP_PIPE3
>>   	tristate "OMAP PIPE3 PHY Driver"
>>   	select GENERIC_PHY
>> -	select OMAP_CONTROL_USB
>> +	select OMAP_CONTROL_PHY
>>   	help
>>   	  Enable this to support the PIPE3 PHY that is part of SOC. This
>>   	  driver takes care of all the PHY functionality apart from comparator.
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> index 48bf9f2..f0127f6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>   #
>>
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY)	+= phy-core.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_CONTROL_PHY)	+= phy-omap-control.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_USB2)		+= phy-omap-usb2.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_PIPE3)	+= phy-omap-pipe3.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_TWL4030_USB)	+= phy-twl4030-usb.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-omap-control.c b/drivers/phy/phy-omap-control.c
>> similarity index 55%
>> rename from drivers/usb/phy/phy-omap-control.c
>> rename to drivers/phy/phy-omap-control.c
>> index 1a7e19a..ece3573 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-omap-control.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-omap-control.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>   /*
>> - * omap-control-usb.c - The USB part of control module.
>> + * phy-omap-control.c - The USB part of control module.
>>    *
>>    * Copyright (C) 2013 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com
>>    * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> @@ -24,36 +24,36 @@
>>   #include <linux/err.h>
>>   #include <linux/io.h>
>>   #include <linux/clk.h>
>> -#include <linux/usb/omap_control_usb.h>
>> +#include <linux/phy/omap_control_phy.h>
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>
>> -static const enum omap_control_usb_type omap4_data = OMAP_CTRL_TYPE_OMAP4;
>> -static const enum omap_control_usb_type usb2_data = OMAP_CTRL_TYPE_USB2;
>> -static const enum omap_control_usb_type usb3_data = OMAP_CTRL_TYPE_USB3;
>> -static const enum omap_control_usb_type dra7_data = OMAP_CTRL_TYPE_DRA7;
>> +static const enum omap_control_phy_type omap4_data = OMAP_CTRL_TYPE_OMAP4;
>> +static const enum omap_control_phy_type usb2_data = OMAP_CTRL_TYPE_USB2;
>> +static const enum omap_control_phy_type usb3_data = OMAP_CTRL_TYPE_USB3;
>> +static const enum omap_control_phy_type dra7_data = OMAP_CTRL_TYPE_DRA7;
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id omap_control_usb_id_table[] = {
>> +static const struct of_device_id omap_control_phy_id_table[] = {
>>   	{
>>   		.compatible = "ti,omap4-control-usb",
>>   		.data = &omap4_data,
>> @@ -286,31 +286,31 @@ static const struct of_device_id omap_control_usb_id_table[] = {
>>   	},
>>   	{},
>>   };
>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_control_usb_id_table);
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_control_phy_id_table);
>>   #endif
>>
>> -static struct platform_driver omap_control_usb_driver = {
>> -	.probe		= omap_control_usb_probe,
>> +static struct platform_driver omap_control_phy_driver = {
>> +	.probe		= omap_control_phy_probe,
>>   	.driver		= {
>>   		.name	= "omap-control-usb",
>>   		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
>> -		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(omap_control_usb_id_table),
>> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(omap_control_phy_id_table),
>>   	},
>>   };
>>
>> -static int __init omap_control_usb_init(void)
>> +static int __init omap_control_phy_init(void)
>>   {
>> -	return platform_driver_register(&omap_control_usb_driver);
>> +	return platform_driver_register(&omap_control_phy_driver);
>>   }
>> -subsys_initcall(omap_control_usb_init);
>> +subsys_initcall(omap_control_phy_init);
>
> Any specific reason for having this as subsys_initcall?

No. I think this driver was written when probe defer mechanism was not 
introduced in the kernel.
>
> If not then you can use module_platform_driver().

right.

Thanks
Kishon



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list