[PATCH v2 1/9] i2c: prepare runtime PM support for I2C client devices

Mark Brown broonie at kernel.org
Fri Sep 13 06:31:52 EDT 2013


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:16:11PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:59:50AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Accessing the bus isn't an issue for I2C outside of ACPI, the power
> > management of the device is totally disassociated from the bus and the
> > controller is responsible for ensuring it is available during transfers.

> Yes, but since we want to support ACPI as well, we must make sure that the
> adapter (and the associated controller) is available when client ->probe()
> is called.

Right, but this probably needs to be highlighted more since it's a very
surprising thing for I2C and is causing confusion.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130913/7f900809/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list